Design

Owned by Francesco Chicchiriccò
Last updated: Feb 09, 2013Version comment
3 min read

ConnId is designed to separate the implementation of an application from the dependencies of the application or system it is attempting to connect to. ConnId provides a container to separate the Connector bundle from the application. The framework provides many common features that developers would otherwise need to implement on their own. For instance the framework can provide connection pooling, buffering, timeouts, and filtering.

ConnId is separated into two parts: the API, from which applications can call Connectors, and the SPI, from which developers can create Connectors.

The figures below show how is it possible to decouple an IdM and other apps from their underlying data resources. The framework is also backwards-compatible, so that newer bundles may be deployed without affecting existing ones.

Connector SPI

The Connector SPI is decomposed into several interfaces so that the Connector developer only has to implement the interfaces that the target application or system supports. The Connector API will still provide a consistent view regardless of the interfaces the Connector developer chooses to implement. The SPI is broken up into operations (create, update, delete, search, etc.), features, and requirements. The required interfaces include the Connector interface and the Configuration interface. These interfaces must be implemented in order for the API to understand which class contains the implementation of the configuration and which contains the implementation of the operations. The feature based interfaces at this time are the 'AttributeNormalizer' and 'PoolableConnector' interfaces. The operation interfaces determine the features the connector supports (such as Create, Delete, or simply Search). Please see the Javadoc for more details.

Connector API

The Connector API is responsible for presenting a consistent view of a Connector regardless of the operations it has implemented. For the convenience of the SPI developer there are several common features that are provided right out of the box. For most of these features there is no need for the API developer to handle them, only configure them. Below is a list of features and their explanation. The main features/concepts of the API are as follows:

  • Provide Connection Pooling to those Connectors that require it and avoid the API from seeing it, since not all Connectors have connections. In addition if the Connector uses Connection Pooling, it's not the responsibility of the API developer to handle the connections, nor dispose of them during error conditions.
  • Provide Timeouts to all operations. The API consumer should only configure the appropriate timeout if the default is unacceptable. Each SPI developer should not have to implement such a common service and so it is implemented in the framework.
  • Provide Search Filtering via a simple interface that accepts a large variety of filters. The Connector developer only needs to implement whichever filters the resource natively supports; the rest is handled by the framework.
  • Provide Search/Sync Buffering, allowing queries and updates to be handled in chunks if need be. The application need not worry about this, as it is handled within the framework.
  • Provide Scripting via Groovy. This will allow for great flexibility within a Connector, because the framework can execute scripts both on the connector and on the target resource (if supported).
  • The SPI developer has the ability to choose different implementations of an operation. For instance there are two types of updates. This is hidden from the API consumer because there is no need for the API developer to have to call two different operations that essentially do the same thing. Instead the framework will figure which one (if either) the Connector supports and make the appropriate calls.

Error Handling

There are no declared exceptions on any of the interfaces for either the SPI or API. At first this may seem strange but there is a method to the madness. We concede the fact that at least one Connector implementation will throw a RuntimeException intentionally or not. Also we'd like to encourage the use of standard Java exceptions like IllegalArgumentException and IllegalStateException. Also for the benefit of the debugging and logging we like to encourage Connector developers to wrap their native exceptions in a RuntimeException so that the underlying exception data is not lost.

Please see the Javadoc for more information.